^{Photo: Bloomberg.com}

Federal Government Moves to Centralize AI Regulation

President Donald Trump signed a sweeping executive order on Thursday establishing a single national regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, effectively limiting the authority of individual states to impose their own rules. The directive aims to prevent what the administration describes as a burdensome and conflicting “patchwork” of state-level regulations that could impede U.S. competitiveness in the global AI race.

The order asserts that the United States must prioritize speed and flexibility in AI development, stating that innovation is hindered when companies must comply with dozens of different regulatory regimes across the country. The administration’s position is that a unified rulebook—led by federal agencies rather than state legislatures—is essential for accelerating domestic AI leadership.

Tech Investors and Industry Leaders Present for the Signing

Trump was joined in the Oval Office by several high-profile technology figures, including David Sacks, the White House’s AI and crypto adviser, and venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya. Both have been vocal supporters of stronger federal oversight and reduced state interference. Sen. Ted Cruz and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also attended the ceremony, signaling coordinated political support behind the policy shift.

The presence of Sacks and Palihapitiya underscores Silicon Valley’s growing influence in shaping public policy. Over the past year, major AI companies—including OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Meta—have steadily increased their Washington presence. According to industry estimates, tech firms and venture groups have collectively committed more than $100 million to a new super PAC dedicated to influencing the 2026 midterm elections and supporting candidates who back federal-first AI governance.

Tech Sector Wins a Major Regulatory Victory

For large AI developers and investors, the executive order represents one of the most significant regulatory wins in recent years. Technology firms have long argued that state-driven rules—especially those emerging from California and New York—pose compliance challenges that slow down innovation, raise costs, and threaten the United States’ competitive advantage against countries like China, which operates under a unified national strategy for AI governance.

A draft version of the order circulated in Washington last month confirmed the administration’s intent to replace state-specific requirements with a single federal standard. Earlier in the year, congressional Republicans attempted to implement a 10-year freeze on state-level AI regulations through a broader spending bill, though that provision was ultimately removed before the legislation gained approval.

Creation of a Federal AI Litigation Task Force

The executive order directs the attorney general to form a specialized AI Litigation Task Force, dedicated exclusively to challenging state laws that conflict with federal AI policy. The Department of Justice will be responsible for identifying state-level statutes considered obstructive or inconsistent with the new national framework and pursuing legal action when necessary.

Administrative officials say the task force will help ensure that federal oversight remains the primary mechanism for regulating AI, particularly in areas related to safety, model training standards, data governance, and transparency requirements.

Financial Penalties for Non-Compliant States

The order includes significant financial implications for states that refuse to align with federal AI regulations. Within 90 days, the Commerce Department must outline funding eligibility criteria under the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. States will need to demonstrate adherence to the federal AI framework to continue receiving BEAD funds, which are intended to expand high-speed internet access in underserved rural areas.

This funding mechanism gives the federal government substantial leverage, as dozens of states depend heavily on BEAD allocations for infrastructure development.

National Strategy Signals Long-Term Shift

Trump’s executive order marks a substantial reorientation of U.S. technology policy. By centralizing authority in Washington, the administration is laying the groundwork for long-term national oversight in areas such as AI safety compliance, ethical standards, model evaluation, and corporate accountability.

The move positions the federal government as the primary arbiter of AI governance for the coming decade and reinforces the view that national competitiveness—and not state autonomy—will guide U.S. strategy in emerging technologies.