^{Source: Yahooo}

A Legal Battle Over Economic Policy

In a bold legal move, five small American businesses have filed a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, arguing that his sweeping tariffs on foreign imports are unconstitutional and economically devastating. Filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, the suit challenges the legal foundation of Trump’s recent tariff actions, stating they were imposed without congressional approval under the guise of a national emergency that doesn’t truly exist.

What the Lawsuit Claims: A Misuse of Emergency Powers

The businesses, represented by the Liberty Justice Center, argue that President Trump violated the U.S. Constitution by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify a wide-ranging set of tariffs. They claim that the IEEPA does not authorize the president to unilaterally impose global tariffs without a true emergency or congressional backing.

“Trade deficits are not new, nor are they dangerous. They’ve existed for decades without triggering national crises,” the complaint reads.
“The President cannot create an economic emergency out of thin air just to sidestep Congress.”

The suit stresses that only Congress has the authority to levy tariffs, and any attempt to bypass that power erodes the foundational principle of “no taxation without representation.”

Who’s Suing: A Look at the Plaintiffs

The five small businesses come from a wide range of industries and represent the very backbone of the U.S. economy:

• VOS Selections (New York): A wine and spirits importer focused on small-batch, artisanal producers.
• FishUSA (Pennsylvania): A leading online retailer for sportfishing tackle and gear.
• Genova Pipe (Utah): A manufacturer of plastic pipes and fittings used in plumbing and construction.
• MicroKits LLC (Virginia): A producer of STEM-focused educational kits and small musical instruments.
• Terry Precision Cycling (Vermont): A women’s cycling apparel brand with a loyal national following.

These companies report being blindsided by the sudden and steep tariff hikes — with rates starting at 10% and rising significantly for certain product categories.

The Financial Fallout: Tariffs Threaten Survival

The lawsuit highlights the real-world consequences of these tariffs for small businesses. One of the plaintiffs, Terry Precision Cycling, has already paid $25,000 in unplanned tariffs in 2025 alone. But that's just the beginning.

The company anticipates:

• $250,000 in cumulative costs by end of 2025
• A staggering $1.2 million in tariffs in 2026, which the company warns is “simply not survivable.”

“These costs aren’t hypothetical,” the lawsuit argues. “They translate to job losses, halted production, and the collapse of niche American businesses.”

Meanwhile, companies like FishUSA and Genova Pipe warn that price increases will inevitably be passed on to consumers, reducing competitiveness and threatening long-term sustainability.

Legal Grounds and Constitutional Arguments

At the heart of the lawsuit is the claim that the Trump administration's use of the IEEPA oversteps its legal boundaries. The IEEPA is traditionally reserved for responding to "unusual and extraordinary threats" — typically military conflicts or direct national security risks.

“Trade imbalances don’t meet that threshold. And applying tariffs to countries where we even have a trade surplus further invalidates the claim of emergency,” the Liberty Justice Center argues.

Legal experts say this case could set a historic precedent, redefining presidential limits in economic policymaking.

Broader Impact: Small Businesses vs. Big Government

This lawsuit represents more than a single economic dispute — it's a clash between federal power and entrepreneurial survival. Small businesses, which account for nearly 44% of U.S. economic activity, often lack the resources to adapt quickly to sweeping policy changes like this.

The plaintiffs argue that had they been consulted — or had Congress played its constitutional role — the tariffs could have been more targeted, fair, and manageable.

White House Response and Public Reaction

As of now, the White House has not commented on the lawsuit. However, economic commentators and trade analysts have weighed in, largely criticizing the broad use of emergency powers in a non-emergency context.

According to a 2024 report by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the Trump-era tariffs caused an estimated $57 billion in annual losses to U.S. businesses — with small and medium enterprises bearing the brunt due to limited purchasing power and supply chain leverage.

A Defining Moment for Trade Law

If successful, this lawsuit could fundamentally reshape the way tariffs are imposed in the U.S., reaffirming the role of Congress in economic governance and offering relief to thousands of small businesses nationwide.

“This case isn’t just about tariffs,” said one of the plaintiffs. “It’s about fairness, legal checks and balances, and ensuring small businesses have a future in America’s economy.”

‍