Speaker of the House Mike Johnson takes questions on tariffs last week. This week he is trying to pass a budget bill that will increase the national debt by $4 trillion over 10 years. (J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press)
As the U.S. Senate prepares to deliberate the controversial "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" — a sweeping tax proposal recently passed in the House — fresh projections suggest the legislation could inflate the national debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade when interest payments and broader economic effects are factored in.
The massive potential cost has drawn criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with at least one Republican lawmaker describing it as a “debt bomb ticking under the economy.” Economists and analysts warn that this expanding deficit could pose a serious threat to the financial health of both the U.S. government and everyday Americans.
The legislation, which combines a series of tax cuts and business incentives, has been marketed by House Republicans as a growth-oriented tax overhaul. But according to independent budget analysts — including the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) — the bill could increase federal deficits by at least $3.5 trillion over 10 years, after accounting for interest payments and macroeconomic feedback.
That figure doesn't include any spending cuts to offset the lost revenue, making it a direct contributor to the debt, which already surpassed $34.7 trillion as of June 2025, according to data from the U.S. Treasury Department.
Critics have accused proponents of the bill of relying on what one GOP senator called “fantasy math” — overestimating the positive economic impact of tax cuts while ignoring the long-term costs of growing deficits. While supporters argue the bill will stimulate investment and boost productivity, the numbers tell a more complicated story.
According to a Penn Wharton Budget Model, similar tax changes in the past have yielded minimal long-term GDP gains and often failed to pay for themselves through economic growth alone.
“We’ve seen this movie before,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the CRFB. “Short-term gains are wiped out by long-term costs. The math just doesn’t add up.”
While discussions around federal deficits may feel distant, the consequences of rising debt are anything but abstract for most Americans. Economists point out three primary ways in which ballooning national debt can directly impact individual finances:
As the government issues more debt to finance its spending, competition for capital increases — pushing up interest rates. That translates into more expensive mortgages, car loans, student loans, and credit card interest for everyday consumers.
Rising debt levels can also undermine investor confidence, leading to declining bond values. If inflation rises in response to deficit spending, fixed-income investments like bonds may see their real value erode, directly affecting retirees and long-term savers.
Eventually, mounting debt must be addressed — often through future tax increases or reductions in government services like Social Security, Medicare, or infrastructure spending. These changes could diminish quality of life and economic stability in the long run.
The Senate is expected to debate the bill in the coming weeks, and its fate remains uncertain. While House Republicans are unified behind the legislation, Senate moderates and fiscal hawks are raising red flags about the projected costs.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is currently preparing a more detailed analysis of the bill’s fiscal impact, which could sway undecided lawmakers. In the meantime, the White House has signaled it may veto the bill if it reaches the President’s desk without sufficient fiscal safeguards.
The U.S. is already spending over $1 trillion annually on interest payments alone, according to the latest Congressional Budget Office report — more than it spends on national defense. If the national debt continues to grow at this pace, interest payments could become the single largest item in the federal budget by 2030.
This raises larger concerns about intergenerational equity — whether today’s borrowing will leave future Americans saddled with crushing fiscal burdens and fewer opportunities for economic mobility.
While tax reform is a critical and complex issue, the growing scrutiny over this latest GOP-backed proposal highlights the importance of balancing short-term political wins with long-term economic stability.
For individuals, this debate is a reminder to stay vigilant about how national fiscal policy shapes personal financial realities — from borrowing costs to retirement savings and the health of the broader economy.
Let me know if you'd like a visual infographic, podcast-style script, or LinkedIn carousel post for this article.