Photo: Newsweek
When Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her £70 billion ($95 billion) budget boost last fall — funded by £40 billion in tax hikes and borrowing — she promised Britons it was a one-time event. “We’re not going to be coming back with more tax increases, or indeed more borrowing,” she told Parliament.
Fast forward to mid-2025, and that assurance appears to be on shaky ground.
Faced with a deteriorating economic outlook, rising debt interest payments, and shrinking fiscal space, the UK government is under intensifying pressure to introduce more tax hikes — perhaps as early as this Autumn Budget.
When Reeves introduced her budget in 2024, the UK Treasury had roughly £9.9 billion in fiscal headroom — the cushion allowing the government to meet its key fiscal rule: to cover day-to-day spending through tax revenues, not borrowing.
But things have taken a turn:
According to ING economist James Smith, if the OBR downgrades its 2026 growth forecast to just 1.5%, the UK’s fiscal headroom could be halved or completely erased, leaving Chancellor Reeves with a £4 billion+ shortfall — even before additional spending pressures are considered.
Asked by Sky News if further tax hikes are coming, Reeves sidestepped the question, saying she wouldn’t “write another four years’ worth of budgets before we’ve even got through the first year.”
Still, her silence speaks volumes. Economists increasingly believe that more taxes are not a question of if, but when.
Adding to the sense of urgency, preliminary data released last Thursday showed that UK GDP shrank 0.3% in April, with output weighed down by new trade tariffs and last year’s tax increases.
The government has already backtracked on some proposed spending cuts, such as reversing plans to scrap pensioners’ winter fuel payments. At the same time, it’s doubling down on public service spending, with significant increases announced for healthcare and defense last week.
With Chancellor Reeves determined to stick to her “ironclad” fiscal rules, and with borrowing politically toxic, economists say she is running out of options.
According to Paul Johnson, Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Reeves is “balancing on a knife-edge,” and any downgrade to growth projections will “almost certainly spark more tax rises.”
One of the biggest dilemmas facing Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer is how to balance the books without breaking Labour’s key manifesto pledges, which include:
According to Mujtaba Rahman of the Eurasia Group, these promises are likely to come under enormous strain, and internal party debates are already underway about which ones may have to be revised — if not broken.
“The easiest route fiscally would be to breach Labour’s manifesto pledges,” Rahman said. “But Starmer does not want to do that, fearing a backlash over ‘broken promises.’”
While the exact form of future tax hikes remains uncertain, economists have floated several likely targets:
These smaller measures could allow Reeves to avoid headline-grabbing tax increases while still bringing in meaningful revenue.
The chancellor’s balancing act is becoming increasingly precarious. With limited room to maneuver and public services in desperate need of investment, Reeves may be forced to trade political capital for fiscal stability.
“Life is only going to get harder for the Treasury as it looks to maintain that balancing act throughout the summer,” said Paul Johnson. “The fiscal constraints are all too real — and we can’t have everything we might want.”
As the UK economy wobbles and the government’s fiscal breathing room disappears, Reeves faces her biggest challenge yet. Tax hikes may soon move from political taboo to fiscal necessity, despite earlier promises.
Whether she can manage the economic realities without breaking the trust of voters — or her party’s core pledges — will define her legacy and the future of Labour’s economic agenda.