Source: Forbes
The Proposed Tax Hike and What It Means for High Earners
As the U.S. faces a growing budget deficit and the need to fund large-scale spending, President Donald Trump has floated the idea of a tax increase for the wealthiest Americans. This move, aimed at funding his new tax and spending plan, would raise the top income tax rate from 37% back to 39.6% for individuals earning more than $2.5 million annually. This would bring the tax rate to levels seen before the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) under Trump, which lowered the top tax rate.
In a recent phone call, Trump pushed House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to support the tax hike and close the “carried interest loophole,” which allows investment managers to pay lower taxes on their earnings. Trump emphasized that this tax increase would be crucial for preserving social programs like Medicaid and ensuring that tax cuts for middle-class Americans remain intact.
Trump’s Stance and Republican Resistance
On Friday, Trump made his position clear through a Truth Social post, where he said that he would "graciously accept" the tax hike on the wealthy to benefit lower and middle-income workers. However, he also noted that Republicans "probably shouldn't do it" but stated he was "OK if they do!"
The proposed increase comes at a time when the TCJA’s tax cuts are set to expire in 2025. These tax cuts, which reduced the top federal income tax rate from 39.6% to 37%, will revert back to the higher rate unless Congress acts to extend them.
Currently, for 2025, the 37% tax rate kicks in for single filers with taxable income exceeding $626,350. Trump’s proposal would essentially restore the top 39.6% rate, bringing it back to pre-TCJA levels, which were in effect from 2013 to 2017.
Historical Context of the Top Tax Rate
To understand how Trump’s proposed tax hike compares to historical rates, it’s important to look back at how tax rates have fluctuated over the years. From 1944 to 1945, the top federal income tax rate in the U.S. was a staggering 94%, during World War II. In contrast, the rate was much lower during most of the early 2000s, sitting at 35%.
The top rate was last raised to 39.6% under President Bill Clinton in the 1990s and remained in place through 2017. If Trump’s proposal were enacted, it would take the tax rate for high earners back to the same level it was during President Obama’s second term.
However, it’s important to note that these comparisons don't account for differences in income brackets, deductions, and exemptions during each era. For example, the amount of income subject to these top rates, as well as available tax deductions and credits, varied significantly over time.
The Roadblock: Republican Resistance
Trump’s push for a tax hike faces a major hurdle: lack of support from his own party. Republican members of Congress, especially those concerned with fiscal conservatism, are hesitant to approve a tax hike on high earners. There’s a "math issue" at play here, according to Natasha Sarin, president of the Yale Budget Lab. Many of the proposals being discussed simply do not cover the costs of funding Trump's multi-trillion-dollar spending package.
Republicans may also be concerned about alienating wealthy donors, who play a crucial role in funding political campaigns. While Trump has expressed openness to this tax hike, it remains unclear whether his proposal will gain traction within his party.
The Bigger Picture: Financing a Trillion-Dollar Package
The tax hike is part of a larger conversation about how to finance the multitrillion-dollar spending package that Republicans and the Trump administration are working on. As more details emerge, it's clear that lawmakers are wrestling with how to balance the need for social programs with the reality of growing debt.
While Trump’s tax hike proposal is still in the early stages, it highlights the larger debate about how to fund government services in an era of ballooning deficits and inflation concerns.