^{Photo: South China Morning Post}

Paramount’s $16 Million Settlement with Trump Over CBS Lawsuit Sparks Bribery Allegations and Political Fallout

New York, NY — Paramount Global has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump, stemming from a CBS 60 Minutes interview aired in 2024 with Democratic opponent Vice President Kamala Harris. The case—originally filed by Trump with a demand for a staggering $20 billion in damages—alleged deceptive editing in the Emmy-nominated segment, claims that media analysts have repeatedly labeled unfounded.

While Paramount denies wrongdoing and made no apology as part of the agreement, critics say the timing and nature of the settlement suggest more than just a legal resolution—it could reflect a broader effort to curry favor with the Trump administration amid the company’s efforts to push through a multi-billion-dollar merger with Skydance Media.

Background: The Interview and the Lawsuit

In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, both major party candidates were invited to sit down for traditional 60 Minutes interviews. Vice President Harris participated in the segment, which aired in October and was later nominated for an Emmy Award. Trump, after initially accepting the offer, pulled out at the last minute.

In the aftermath, Trump repeatedly claimed the interview was manipulated to unfairly portray Harris and damage his campaign. He accused CBS and the show of “illegal and unlawful behavior,” called for the FCC to revoke the network’s license, and demanded massive penalties.

Despite a lack of concrete evidence, Trump proceeded with a civil suit, seeking $20 billion in damages—a figure widely dismissed as excessive and unserious by legal experts.

The Settlement: $16 Million and a Presidential Library

The $16 million payout—brokered by a mediator—includes attorney fees and other legal costs, with the remaining amount reportedly allocated to fund Trump’s future presidential library. Paramount emphasized the settlement was not an admission of fault and was not connected to any pending business ventures.

In a statement released late Tuesday, the company said:

“This lawsuit is completely separate from and unrelated to the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process.”

But that hasn’t quieted growing concerns about the timing and implications of the deal.

Critics Sound Alarm: “A Bribe in Plain Sight?”

Several Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden, and Bernie Sanders, have publicly raised red flags about the transaction. In a joint letter to Paramount Chairwoman Shari Redstone, they wrote:

“Paramount appears to be trying to settle a lawsuit that it has assessed as ‘completely without merit.’ If these concessions are part of a quid pro quo to influence President Trump or other administration officials, they may be breaking the law.”

Sen. Wyden was more direct in a follow-up statement:

“Paramount just paid a bribe for merger approval. When Democrats retake power, I’ll be first in line calling for federal charges.”

Sen. Warren echoed those sentiments on Bluesky, calling for an immediate investigation and announcing plans to introduce legislation to curb corporate political corruption:

“This looks like bribery in plain sight. I’m working on a bill to rein in this kind of corruption before it poisons more of our institutions.”

Internal Fallout at CBS and Industry Impact

The lawsuit and settlement have already triggered shakeups within the network. Over the last two months, both the head of CBS News and the executive producer of 60 Minutes have resigned, according to insiders at the company. Industry experts say the reputational damage is compounding—especially as other major news outlets come under legal fire.

Interestingly, the $16 million figure matches a previous settlement reached between ABC News and Trump in December 2024, which involved a separate defamation case against George Stephanopoulos. That settlement also avoided an admission of guilt but was widely seen as a strategic move by the network.

Paramount’s Merger Pressure

Behind the legal maneuvering lies a major strategic motivation: Paramount’s pending merger with Skydance Media, a deal that requires FCC approval and potential review by the Department of Justice. While the company insists the settlement has no connection to that approval process, The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Paramount executives have been working to resolve the lawsuit in a way that would shield directors and officers from criminal or shareholder liability.

“Over the past few months, Paramount leaders have been wrestling with how to pay to settle the lawsuit without exposing directors and officers to liability,” the Journal reported, citing anonymous internal sources.

A Growing Storm

With Paramount now cutting a $16 million check to settle a lawsuit that many legal observers believe had no merit, the conversation is shifting from a legal matter to a political and ethical scandal.

As one Democratic staffer told The Hill:

“This is not just about media accountability or even Trump’s grudge with the press. It’s about the integrity of our institutions, the transparency of corporate influence, and whether billion-dollar companies are quietly buying policy outcomes behind closed doors.”

With investigations likely to follow and political pressure mounting, the Paramount-Trump settlement may prove to be far more than a headline—it could be a flashpoint in the fight over corporate power and media independence in the Trump era.