^{Photo: Bloomberg.com}

Microsoft faced a dramatic internal protest this week as activists, including current and former employees, entered the office of company president Brad Smith to denounce the alleged use of Microsoft technology by the Israeli military. The demonstration, organized by the activist collective No Azure for Apartheid, has intensified scrutiny of the software giant’s contracts and raised broader questions about the role of tech companies in global conflicts.

The Protest Inside Microsoft Headquarters

On Tuesday, seven activists gained access to Microsoft’s Building 34 on its Redmond, Washington, campus. Once inside, they occupied Brad Smith’s office, delivered what they called a “court summons notice,” and demanded the company sever ties with Israel.

Smith described the incident as a serious security breach. “Storming an office, blocking staff, and planting listening devices, even in crude forms such as hidden cell phones, is unacceptable,” he said. The group refused to leave voluntarily, leading Microsoft to call in local police. All seven were escorted out, with Smith confirming that two of the participants were current employees.

Microsoft’s Response and Employee Backlash

Smith emphasized that Microsoft welcomes open dialogue and does not punish employees for expressing personal views. However, he noted that threats and disruptive actions cross a line that could lead to disciplinary consequences.

The protest was part of a broader campaign by No Azure for Apartheid, which has staged multiple demonstrations this year, including at Microsoft’s 50th anniversary celebrations and its annual Build developer conference. Last week, a separate protest around the Redmond campus led to 20 arrests, although Smith clarified that 16 of those arrested had no professional ties to Microsoft.

The Allegations Driving the Movement

The protests follow an investigation published by The Guardian, which reported that the Israeli military may be using Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to store Palestinians’ phone calls as part of its surveillance efforts in Gaza.

Microsoft has since authorized an independent third-party review to determine whether its cloud services or other technologies have been used in ways that violate the company’s ethical standards. “The responsible step is clear: to investigate thoroughly and determine the truth,” Smith said.

He added that most of Microsoft’s work with Israel is related to cybersecurity, not surveillance, and stressed that the company aims to provide technology responsibly.

Broader Industry Context

Microsoft’s controversy mirrors tensions across Silicon Valley as major tech firms deepen their ties with defense agencies. Artificial intelligence and cloud computing have become central to modern warfare, fueling debates over whether private companies should be involved in military operations.

Last year, Google dismissed 28 employees after similar protests disrupted its offices. Some of those demonstrators targeted Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian’s office, objecting to the company’s contracts with Israel’s government.

The Human Dimension

The conflict over Microsoft’s role in Israel highlights the complex balance between corporate responsibility, employee activism, and geopolitical realities. Smith acknowledged the humanitarian toll of the ongoing war, pointing to the thousands of civilians killed in Gaza since Israel’s offensive began, as well as the Israeli citizens killed or taken hostage in the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023.

Microsoft insists that its commitment is to deliver technology ethically while respecting international law and human rights. Whether the company’s internal investigation can satisfy critics and calm tensions among its workforce remains an open question.

‍