^{Photo: Yahoo News Canada}

Alphabet, the parent company of Google, saw its stock soar 8% in after-hours trading on Tuesday after a federal court ruling spared the tech giant from the most damaging penalties in its long-running antitrust battle with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

The decision, delivered by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, marks a pivotal moment in the landmark antitrust case that has gripped Silicon Valley and Wall Street alike. While Google was previously found guilty of maintaining an illegal monopoly in internet search, the latest ruling significantly reduced the severity of the proposed remedies.

A Narrow Escape from Breakup Demands

At the heart of the DOJ’s push was a demand that Google divest key assets—including its Chrome browser and potentially its Android operating system. Both platforms are essential to Google’s dominance in digital advertising and mobile search.

Judge Mehta rejected these proposals, stating:
“Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment.”

This rejection of structural remedies was a relief for investors, fueling Alphabet’s share rally. Analysts had warned that a forced breakup could have dismantled Google’s core business model, potentially reducing billions in annual advertising revenue.

Restrictions on Exclusive Contracts

Although Google avoided the harshest measures, it will no longer be able to enforce exclusive contracts with device manufacturers and partners. The company had long paid Apple billions of dollars annually to remain the default search engine on iPhones—a deal widely seen as cementing its monopoly.

Going forward, Google can still make payments to preload its services, but these deals cannot be exclusive or conditional. This opens the door for rival search engines to compete for placement on browsers and devices.

Apple, which benefits heavily from Google’s payments, also saw its shares climb 4% in after-hours trading, signaling investor confidence that the arrangement will continue—albeit under less restrictive terms.

Data-Sharing Obligations

Another key element of the ruling is Google’s obligation to share parts of its search index data and user interaction data with competitors. However, the company will not be required to share advertising data, protecting its most lucrative revenue stream.

The court emphasized that data-sharing must be done on “ordinary commercial terms” similar to Google’s existing syndication services. This provision is designed to prevent Google from using its vast data advantage to stifle competition in search and emerging technologies, including generative AI.

DOJ’s Perspective and GenAI Implications

The DOJ hailed the ruling as a win for competition, noting that it “recognizes the need to pry open the market for general search services, which has been frozen in place for over a decade.”

Crucially, the remedies extend beyond traditional search and into generative AI (GenAI)—a fast-growing sector where Google aims to compete with rivals like OpenAI and Microsoft. Regulators made it clear they intend to prevent Google from repeating the same tactics in AI that helped it dominate search.

Market Impact and Investor Sentiment

The stock market responded swiftly to the decision. Alphabet’s shares jumped 8%, adding tens of billions of dollars in market value overnight, as investors interpreted the ruling as a “best-case scenario” given the circumstances.

Apple, a secondary player in the case due to its lucrative partnership with Google, gained 4% after hours. Analysts noted that while the judgment limits exclusivity, it does not ban Google from paying Apple and others for distribution, ensuring both companies continue benefiting financially.

Looking Ahead

Judge Mehta ordered Google and the DOJ to meet by September 10 to finalize the terms of the judgment. While Google expressed concerns over user privacy and potential unintended consequences, the company acknowledged relief that the court dismissed the DOJ’s most extreme proposals.

For investors, the outcome highlights Google’s resilience in the face of regulatory challenges. The company retains control of its most important platforms, avoids a breakup, and maintains flexibility in its distribution strategy—factors that underpin its dominance in search and advertising.

The case, however, is far from over. With regulators targeting Big Tech’s influence in both traditional markets and emerging AI technologies, Alphabet and its peers may face more battles ahead. But for now, Wall Street has spoken: Google dodged its biggest threat yet.

‍