
Photo: Geely Australia
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group has been steadily building a strategic presence in the United States—not through direct entry under its own name, but through a network of global automotive investments that already operate within the American market. This approach has allowed the Chinese conglomerate to establish a meaningful foothold in one of the world’s most tightly protected automotive markets.
Geely, as the group is commonly known, holds controlling or significant stakes in several well-known Western automotive brands, including Volvo Cars, Polestar, and Lotus Cars. It also maintains minority positions in luxury manufacturers such as Mercedes-Benz and Aston Martin, further extending its indirect influence across the global auto industry.
At the same time, Geely operates its own Chinese automotive division, which includes brands like Zeekr, Lynk & Co, and Geely Auto. Together, these entities form a multi-layered global structure that gives the company both manufacturing scale and brand diversity.
Despite strong political resistance in the United States toward Chinese-made vehicles, Geely has managed to establish a subtle but meaningful presence in the country through its Western subsidiaries. More than 100 Chinese automotive companies, suppliers, and tech firms already maintain some level of operational footprint in the U.S., according to industry estimates from EV-focused consultancy Dunne Insights.
However, direct expansion remains challenging. The U.S. has imposed steep tariffs—up to 100% on Chinese electric vehicles—and is also considering stricter restrictions on connected vehicle technology from Chinese manufacturers. These policy barriers have pushed companies like Geely to rely on alternative entry strategies.
One of Geely’s most important assets in the U.S. market is its ownership stake in Volvo, which provides access to established dealership networks and manufacturing capacity.
Volvo Cars operates a production facility near Charleston, South Carolina, which currently manufactures both Volvo and Polestar vehicles. The plant has a theoretical capacity of around 150,000 units annually, but actual output has been significantly lower, with approximately 18,500 vehicles produced in 2025.
To increase utilization, Volvo has begun expanding production plans in the U.S., including adding output of its XC60 hybrid SUV, which is expected to contribute an additional 45,000 units per year. The company has also outlined ambitions to raise U.S. sales from roughly 122,000 units in 2025 to around 200,000 units in the coming years, with a target of 50% to 60% of those vehicles being manufactured domestically.
This shift is strategically important. Local production not only reduces import costs but also helps mitigate tariff exposure while strengthening political acceptability in the U.S. market.
Beyond manufacturing, Geely’s indirect access to established dealership and service networks provides a significant competitive advantage. Industry experts note that building a national distribution and after-sales service network in the U.S. is one of the most difficult barriers for any new automaker.
Because Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus already operate within these systems, Geely benefits from an infrastructure that would otherwise take decades and billions of dollars to replicate independently.
Among Geely’s portfolio, Zeekr is widely viewed as the most likely candidate for a direct U.S. market entry. The premium EV brand has been positioning itself globally and has already attracted attention in autonomous driving ecosystems.
For example, Zeekr vehicles are currently being used by Waymo as part of its autonomous fleet testing in San Francisco, alongside platforms from other global automakers. This type of collaboration highlights Zeekr’s technological positioning and potential relevance in the U.S. EV and autonomous driving ecosystem.
However, analysts suggest that rather than launching independently, Zeekr may initially enter through partnerships or rebadged models to reduce regulatory and distribution barriers.
Geely is not alone in exploring indirect U.S. exposure. Other global automotive groups are adopting similar strategies. For instance, Stellantis holds a significant stake in Chinese EV maker Leapmotor and is exploring ways to integrate its technology into existing Western brands such as Fiat and Jeep.
This approach reflects a broader industry trend where global automakers are increasingly collaborating across borders, even as geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions intensify.
The U.S. political environment remains a major obstacle for Chinese automakers. Bipartisan concerns around national security, data privacy, and supply chain dependence have led to aggressive trade restrictions and regulatory scrutiny.
At the same time, policy signals are not entirely uniform. Former and current political leaders have indicated conditional openness to foreign automakers investing in U.S. manufacturing, provided they create local jobs and production capacity.
This creates a complex operating environment where direct imports face resistance, but localized production and partnerships remain more politically acceptable.
Geely’s expansion strategy in the United States is less about direct entry and more about leveraging global assets, strategic investments, and manufacturing flexibility. Through Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus, the company already has indirect access to infrastructure, customers, and production capacity inside the U.S.
While geopolitical barriers remain significant, Geely’s multi-brand structure gives it a unique advantage in navigating restrictions. As the global auto industry continues to evolve toward electrification and software-defined vehicles, the company’s indirect but deeply embedded presence in the U.S. may prove to be one of the most effective long-term entry strategies in the sector.









